The Future of Global Governance in a Fragmented World
The international system built after World War II is showing its age. The United Nations, World Bank, and other pillars of global governance are struggling to manage crises — from pandemics and wars to climate change — amid rising situs judi slot online Naga169 nationalism and distrust.
Multilateralism, once a cornerstone of global cooperation, is under strain. The UN Security Council remains paralyzed by great-power rivalry, with Russia and China often blocking Western-backed resolutions. Meanwhile, developing nations demand greater representation in institutions long dominated by the Global North.
This discontent has fueled new initiatives. The BRICS+ expansion, the African Union’s inclusion in the G20, and calls for reforming the IMF all signal a world shifting toward multipolarity. “Global governance is no longer about one set of rules, but competing systems,” says former UN official Shashi Tharoor.
Technology adds another layer of complexity. From AI regulation to digital privacy, international norms struggle to keep pace with innovation. Civil society movements and city networks increasingly fill governance gaps left by gridlocked states.
Despite dysfunction, global cooperation isn’t dead — just different. The emerging order may be less about universal consensus and more about flexible coalitions tackling shared problems. The question is whether the world can reinvent its institutions before fragmentation becomes permanent.